It is possible to maintain a particular level of income in the advanced economy if all savings at that level are invested. Some of the most striking differences between the life cycle and simple Keynesian consumption function arise when their respective predictions of the response of budgeted consumption to these unanticipated changes in income and wealth are compared. It does not mean that the level of current income has no effect on current consumption under the life cycle hypothesis. It does have an effect because current income is one of the important constituents of total wealth.

  1. It shows that consumption is not only a function of income but income can also be a function of consumption.
  2. Rather, the apparent constancy of the APC suggested a long-run proportional consumption function (C ), such that the APC equals the MPC.
  3. Some criticisms of the absolute or the relative income hypothesis concern the occurrence of statistical artefacts [20].

To overcome these issues, we formulate the hypothesis that the distribution of health in a society is correlated with the distribution of income in that society and propose the analytical method framework. The method is focused on the calculation of Foster–Greer–Thorbecke (FGT) poverty indices using health and income outcomes. Econometric time series methods, particularly the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) cointegration bounds test and dynamic simulation, are complementary tools used to measure the relationship between the calculated indices. Applied to the sub-sample of countries below the poverty line, the method highlights the correlation between the gaps and inequalities in health outcomes and the gaps and inequalities in income outcomes, respectively. On this basis, he inferred that from an aggregate time-series point of view the relative income hypothesis could be transformed into one expressing the saving rate as a function of the ratio of current income to the highest level previously reached.

These results light the way for policies aiming to reduce regional health inequalities. The expenditures of the consumer units are set as a constant proportion (k) of this permanent level of income. The value of (k) varying for consumer units of different types and of different tastes. Actual consumption and actual income deviate from these planned, or permanent levels to the extent that transitory factors, enter in.

Understanding Absolute Advantage

In this case, the dynamic simulation approach developed by Jordan and Philips [22] offers an alternative to the hypothesis testing of model coefficients by conveying the substantive significance of the results through meaningful counterfactual scenarios. While this theory has success modeling consumption in the short term, attempts to apply this model over a longer time frame have proven less successful. This has led to the absolute income hypothesis falling out of favor as the consumption model of choice for economists.[3] Keynes’ consumption function has come to be known as ‘absolute income hypothesis’ or ‘absolute income theory’. His statement of the relationship between income and consumption was based on psychological law. In his or her middle years, income will be high and the propensity to consume will be lower. Over the consumer’s life-time, however, consumption will be a fixed proportion of total income.

This article provides a complete guide to general theories of consumption function. The most common representation of the AIH is the linear function (inclusive of an intercept) that satisfies (1), (2), and (3), but not (4) (see Figure 1). Such a simple linear consumption function is to be found in nearly all introductory macroeconomic textbooks. Meanwhile, at­tempts were made by the empirically-oriented economists in the late 1930s and early 1940s for testing the conclusions made in the Keynesian consumption function. It may be added that all the characteristics of Keynes’ consumption function are based not on any empirical observation, but on ‘fun­damental psychological law’, i.e., experience and intuition.

How Can Absolute Advantage Benefit a Nation?

The first is the absolute income hypothesis, which states that other factors being constant, the higher an individual’s income, the better their health [9,10,3,11]. The second is the relative income hypothesis, which states that individual health is affected by the distribution of income within a society [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]–18]. In addition, the assumed relationship has been criticised as being a statistical artefact.

Therefore, because Malaysia has a lower opportunity cost, it has a comparative advantage in clothing. Opportunity cost becomes a crucial explanation because we are dealing with scarce resources. When we use resources – such as land, labor, or capital, to produce certain goods, they are not available to produce other goods.

When the war ended, it led to a jump in consumer expenditure due to the increased assets and wealth. This proved that income is not the only determinant of consumption, but, wealth also plays an important role in consumption expenditure. As national income rises consumption grows along the long run consumption, CLR. This means a constant APC consequent upon a steady growth of na­tional income.

However, Simon Kuznets (the 1971 Nobel prize winner in Economics) considered a long period cov­ering 1869 to 1929. This data indicated no long run change in con­sumption despite a very large increase in in­come during the said period. Thus, the long run historical data that generated long run or secular consumption function were inconsist­ent with the Keynesian consumption function. For example, Indonesia can make 1 shoe at an opportunity cost of 0.5 clothes (3/6). However, from David Ricardo’s perspective, Malaysia and Indonesia trade because each has a comparative advantage. In Malaysia, the opportunity cost for 1 unit clothe is only 0.5 shoes (1/2).

Relative Income Hypothesis:

The ratchet keeps the economy from slipping back and loosing all the income gains attained during the preceding expansion. Further, Duesenberry talks of the ‘Demonstration Effect’ according to which the consumption standards of low income groups are greatly affected by the consumption standards of high income groups. On a theoretical level, Duesenberry supplied psychological support for this hypothesis, noting that a .strong tendency in our social set up for people to emulate their neighbours absolute hypothesis and, at the same time, to strive constantly towards a higher standard of living. Hence, once a new, higher standard of living is obtained, as at a cyclical peak, people are reluctant to return to a lower level when income goes down. In other words, people seek to maintain at least the highest standard of living attained in the past. A theory developed by John Maynard Keynes which puts forward the idea that consumption will rise as income rises, but not necessarily at the same rate.

Now, we are in a position to resolve the apparent conflict between the cross-section and the long run time-series data to show a stable permanent relationship between per­manent consumption and permanent income. Another attempt to reconcile three sets of ap­parently contradictory data (cross-sectional data or budget studies data, cyclical or short run time-series data and Kuznets’ long run time-series data) was made by Nobel prize winning Economist, Milton Friedman in 1957. Like Duesenberry’s RIH, Friedman’s hypoth­esis holds that the basic relationship between consumption and income is proportional. Duesenberry’s RIH is based on two hypotheseis first is the relative income hy­pothesis and second is the past peak income hypothesis.

Reasoning that all countries should focus on their advantages, major bodies like the World Bank and IMF have often pressured developing countries to focus on agricultural exports, rather than industrialization. As a result, many of these countries remain at a low level of economic development. In these models, workers and businesses do not relocate in search of better opportunities. Absolute advantage can be accomplished by creating the good or service at a lower absolute cost per unit using a smaller number of inputs, or by a more efficient process. Countless hypotheses have been developed and tested throughout the history of science. The investigation of scientific hypotheses is an important component in the development of scientific theory.

According to Figure 1, the UK commits 80 hours of labor to produce one unit of cloth, which is fewer than Portugal’s hours of work necessary to produce one unit of cloth. The UK is able to produce one unit of cloth with fewer hours of labor, therefore the UK has an absolute advantage in the production of cloth. On the other hand, Portugal commits 90 hours to produce one unit of wine, which is fewer than the UK’s hours of work necessary to produce one unit of wine. Absolute advantage is the ability of an entity to produce a product or service at a lower absolute cost per unit using a smaller number of inputs or a more efficient process than another entity producing the same good or service.

However, Davis suggests a variable to this approach of Duesenberry—that previous peak consumption be substituted for previous peak income. The basis of this is that people get used to a certain standard of consumption, rather than to a certain level of income, so that it is past spending that influences current consumption rather than past income. Although PIT appears to be similar to RIT, there is significant difference.

South Korea does not use its land to grow agricultural commodities or mine. But, the country focuses on manufactured goods where they have a comparative advantage. They import agricultural and mining commodities from abroad to meet domestic demand. All of these models require a rate of return or discount rate which is used to discount a firm’s cash flows—dividends, earnings, operating cash flow (OCF), or free cash flow (FCF)—to get the absolute value of the firm.

Leave a Reply